Mexican Cartels on American Soil

By 2010 Mexican cartels controlled drug distribution in 230 American cities. The Sinaloa Cartel and CJNG now generate revenue that dwarfs everything the Italian-American Mafia achieved at its peak — and fentanyl deaths hit 74000 in 2023.

Mexican Cartels on American Soil

Mexican Cartels on American Soil

By 2010, the DEA assessed that Mexican cartels controlled drug distribution in 230 American cities. By 2020, the Sinaloa Cartel and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel had effectively divided the American wholesale drug market between them, generating revenue that dwarfed anything American organized crime had achieved at its peak.^1^ The Mexican drug cartels that began establishing significant presence on American soil in the 1980s and 1990s did not gradually expand from peripheral operations into the U.S. market. They moved deliberately and systematically, using existing networks, exploiting the American demand that prohibition had made enormous, and eventually supplanting the Colombian cartels that had previously dominated the import end of the cocaine trade.

Part of Other Organized Crime — ← Back to series hub

Mexico Inherited the Drug Trade When Colombia’s Cartels Collapsed

The Colombian cocaine cartels — the Medellín Cartel under Pablo Escobar and the Cali Cartel — dominated the American cocaine market through the 1970s and 1980s, using their own distribution networks and, increasingly, the assistance of Mexican criminal organizations to move product across the U.S.-Mexico border. The fee for transit services started as a cash payment per kilogram. By the mid-1980s, Mexican organizations were increasingly accepting payment in product — a share of the shipment — rather than cash. The distinction mattered enormously, because an organization that receives product rather than cash becomes a distributor rather than a contractor.^1^

The Colombian cartels’ dismantlement — Escobar killed in December 1993, the Cali leadership arrested in 1995 — left the transit routes and distribution infrastructure intact but removed the organizations that had built them. The Mexican organizations, which had been building their own capacity throughout the transit period, stepped into the vacuum. By the late 1990s, Mexican cartels controlled the majority of cocaine entering the United States, along with the majority of heroin, methamphetamine, and eventually fentanyl.

The Sinaloa Cartel Operates Through American Distribution Networks, Not Direct Sales

The Sinaloa Cartel, based in the Pacific coast state of Sinaloa in northwestern Mexico, emerged under the leadership of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, and others as the dominant Mexican drug trafficking organization by the early 2000s. Its operational model in the United States was based on wholesale distribution to American criminal organizations — street gangs, prison gangs, independent distributors — rather than direct retail sales. The cartel moves product to the U.S. border, crosses it through a combination of tunnels, legitimate ports of entry using concealed compartments, and corrupt customs officials, and then sells to American distribution networks at wholesale prices.^1^

Between 2000 and 2015, DEA operations identified Sinaloa Cartel distribution networks in cities from Chicago to New York to Atlanta. In 2012, a Senate subcommittee investigation found that HSBC Bank had laundered an estimated $881 million in Sinaloa Cartel drug proceeds through its U.S. operations, illustrating that cartel money moved through legitimate financial institutions as well as cash smuggling.^1^

Guzmán was arrested in Mexico in February 2014, escaped from Altiplano Federal Prison in July 2015 through a mile-long tunnel equipped with a motorcycle rail, was recaptured in January 2016, and was extradited to the United States in January 2017. He was convicted in federal court in Brooklyn on February 12, 2019, on all ten counts of a racketeering indictment, and sentenced to life imprisonment plus thirty years. The Sinaloa Cartel continued operating after his conviction under Zambada’s leadership.

CJNG Expanded Faster by Accepting More Violence

The Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), founded approximately 2010 and led by Nemesio “El Mencho” Oseguera Cervantes, became the second major cartel with significant American operations through the 2010s. Its approach was more aggressive than the Sinaloa Cartel’s — more willing to use public violence in Mexico, more willing to challenge government authority directly — and it expanded its American distribution networks rapidly.^1^

The DEA’s 2019 assessment identified CJNG presence in twenty-two American states, with operations concentrated in California, Texas, Illinois, and New York. The cartel has been particularly aggressive in expanding fentanyl distribution, which became the dominant American drug death cause in 2016 when fentanyl-related overdoses surpassed heroin for the first time. CDC data for 2023 showed approximately 74,000 fentanyl-related overdose deaths in the United States. The majority of the fentanyl involved was produced in Mexico by cartels including CJNG and Sinaloa, using precursor chemicals imported from China.^1^

How Mexican Cartels Differ From Traditional American Organized Crime

Mexican cartels operating on American soil present a different enforcement challenge than the Italian-American families of the mid-twentieth century or even the regional organizations that managed the Las Vegas skim. The cartels’ command structure is in Mexico, which means that even successful prosecutions of American-side distributors and managers do not affect the organizational leadership. Extradition of cartel leaders to the United States — Guzmán being the most prominent example — requires sustained diplomatic pressure and Mexican political will that has been inconsistent.

The cartels’ relationship with corruption follows a different pattern than the American mob’s. The American organized crime families corrupted specific police precincts, specific judges, specific union officials. The Mexican cartels, operating in jurisdictions where corruption is more pervasive, corrupt entire police forces, municipal governments, and military units — a structural difference that makes law enforcement cooperation between American and Mexican authorities unreliable.^1^

The scale of revenue is simply different. The Sinaloa Cartel’s annual revenue has been estimated by the DOJ at between $3 billion and $39 billion — the range reflects the genuine difficulty of estimating underground economy revenues. Even the low estimate exceeds what the entire Italian-American Mafia at its peak generated nationally. The American drug market, worth an estimated $150 billion per year in consumer spending, generates revenue that dwarfs any other criminal economy in American history.

The traditional American organized crime story — Italian families, Irish mobs, Jewish gangsters, the Commission — is a story about the twentieth century. The cartel story is the present tense.

─────────

Sources:

  1. Grillo, Ioan. El Narco: Inside Mexico’s Criminal Insurgency. Bloomsbury Press, 2011.
  2. Vulliamy, Ed. Amexica: War Along the Borderline. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010.
  3. DEA National Drug Threat Assessment, 2019.
  4. United States v. Guzmán Loera, Eastern District of New York, 2019.